NPWT pressure was applied at -80 mmHg continuous pressure 800 ml

NPWT pressure was applied at -80 mmHg continuous pressure. 800 ml of ascites was removed. Active resuscitation for 24 hours was required at which point a re-laparotomy was performed in order to view the rectal stump and rigid sigmoidoscopy. A second re-laparotomy was required at 48 hours (Figure 1D). The abdomen was closed by delayed primary fascial closure on Day 3 (Figure 1E) with no further complications. Figure 1 A 27 year old male was admitted with blunt abdominal trauma. A damage control laparotomy was performed (A), 90 cm of necrotic bowel removed (B) and NPWT (Renasys F-AB, Smith & Nephew)

applied at -80 mmHg (C). Second look see more lapartomies were performed at 24 and 48 hours (D) and the fascia closed at Day 3 post injury (E). Comparison with published literature In order to compare the results presented here with the existing literature, a systematic search was carried out. Table 5 shows the process of the systematic search. click here Briefly 129 papers were identified, of which 49 passed the selection criteria and were appropriate for detailed review. Of these, a further 13 did not report relevant end-points. Of the remaining 36 papers, studies where >33%

of the study population was septic were excluded because the presence of sepsis has a significant effect on the prognosis and outcomes of the open abdomen patient [10]. In the present study, 25% of wounds at baseline were infected or contaminated. Studies using ‘home-made’ Sulfite dehydrogenase NPWT systems (i.e. vac-pack) were excluded to avoid any variability in outcomes resulting from variability in GDC-0973 cell line components or technique of application.

Vac-pack has also been reported to have slightly less effective outcomes compared to VAC [4, 11] therefore commercial NPWT provided a good benchmark. Open abdomen wounds from all aetiologies were theoretically included but in practice the majority of studies reported traumatic patients with only 2 studies reporting mixed cohorts of patients. Table 5 Systematic review chart Total number of papers identified 129 Reason for exclusion Duplications 4 In vivo studies 9 Paediatric 4 Significant modification to application technique 14 Irrelevant clinical area 21 Reviews/comments/letters 9 Case series <6 18 Number of papers reviewed 48 Reason for exclusion No relevant endpoints 13 Vac-pack removed * 13 Cohorts with >33% septic 15 Number of remaining papers 8 *papers describing results with a non-commercial NPWT technique known as ‘vac-pack’ were excluded. Results of the comparison between the present study and relevant articles identified from the systematic review are shown in Table 6. The identified studies are relatively small in size with a mean patient number of 30. Demographic variables (ISS, age, gender) were acceptably similar between this study and the reported studies (data not shown). Overall, mean fascial closure rates of 63.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>