Figure 6

GA impairs the proliferation of stimulated CD4 +

Figure 6

GA impairs the proliferation of stimulated CD4 + T cells. CD4+ T cells were assayed for effects of GA on their (a) viability, and (b, c) stimulation-induced proliferation. (a) CD4+ T cells (5×105) were supplemented with rhIL-2 (20 U/ml), seeded in triplicates, and aliquots were treated with 0.1 μM GA. After 48 h, viability was assessed by MTT assay. Viability of untreated cells was arbitrarily set to 100%. Data represent means ± SEM of two independent experiments. (b, c) CD4+ T cells (105) were stimulated (b) by allogenic see more MO-DCs (2×104) at unstimulated (-) or stimulated state (stim), and (c) by anti-CD3 (1 μg/ml) AZD5153 supplier plus anti-CD28 antibodies (0.5 μg/ml). T cell proliferation was determined by incorporation of [3H] thymidine for the last 16 h of culture. Data represent the means ± SEM of three independent

experiments each. Statistical significance: (b) *versus unstimulated MO-DCs, $versus stimulated MO-DCs without GA, (c) *versus unstimulated T cells, $versus stimulated T cells without GA (**,$$ P < 0.01, ***,$$$ P < 0.01). These results indicate that GA may hamper the induction of adaptive immune responses both on the level of DC activation as well as T cell stimulation and/or proliferation. Discussion Here we show that the prototypic HSP90 inhibitor GA exerted cytotoxic effects on human MO-DCs both at unstimulated state as well during stimulation in a dose-dependent manner. We chose a concentration of GA (0.1 μM) devoid of QNZ detrimental effects on the viability of MO-DCs to analyze the influence of this agent on the immuno-phenotype and functions of MO-DCs. Of note, this concentration broadly corresponds to plasma levels of GA-derived HSP90 inhibitors used in the course of treatment of patients in clinical trials [32, 33]. Unstimulated MO-DCs treated with GA were characterized by differential regulation of DC surface markers: While CD80 expression levels were reduced, HLA-DR, CD83, and CD86 were upregulated. In accordance with the elevated expression of the latter markers, whose expression Florfenicol is controlled in part by NF-κB

[14], we noted moderately enhanced NF-κB activity in GA-treated HEK293T cells, which may explain in part the enhanced state of activation of likewise treated MO-DCs. However, neither the expression level of the endogenous NF-κB inhibitor IκB-α [34], nor the level and activation state of the ubiquitously expressed NF-κB family member p65 [35] were altered in GA-treated MO-DCs. Moreover, expression of the largely APC-restricted NF-κB family member RelB [36] was actually reduced in this MO-DC population. Therefore, further analysis is required to elucidate whether GA treatment results in activation of NF-κB in unstimulated MO-DCs, and which of the other members of this TF family [13] may be involved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>