LV seems to stimulate the development of the CMI in a controlled manner. The influx of CD8+ cells in groups B and C was constantly increasing as SE numbers decreased. Therefore, at 6 and 9 dpi, the bacterial burden was lower in all groups which received at least one dose of the LV, whilst the high immunoglobulin levels could not decrease SE burden in group D. The high levels of IL-10 in spleen samples are indicative of the important role developed in vaccinated www.selleckchem.com/products/byl719.html animals [25].

After challenge, IL-10 levels decreased in all vaccinated groups which may be an important shift to increase antigen presentation and the pro-inflammatory response. Considering the effective control of the challenge strain, the bacterial ZD1839 cell line burden was significantly decreased in groups C and E. The combination of LV and KV provides a comprehensive immune response. Even though the SG based LV is more efficacious to stimulate the CMI, the KV contains highly immunogenic

proteins, like flagellin, and stimulates high antibody titers. The CMI combined with the higher titer of secretory IgA (Fig. 2) could be associated with the good efficacy of the vaccine program used in group E. B cells and related immunoglobulins can be important for the effective control of Salmonella infection [47], as they can present Salmonella antigens and generate an effective immune response by CTLs [48]. In summary, this study elucidates aspects of the humoral and cellular immune responses triggered by different vaccine programs using LV and KV, and correlates the control of infection with the efficacy of each vaccine program. It was shown that using KV, only, does not appear to control high bacterial numbers, despite the high immunoglobulin levels generated. The bacterin showed an impaired ability to elicit CD8+ T cells because responses, compared to the LV. However, the combination of LV and KV on the same vaccine program showed greater efficacy, together with the use of two doses of LV, both vaccine programs stimulated a

protective immunity against this pathogen. Overall, this study reinforced the importance of vaccination for the effective control of SE infections for poultry production and showed novel alternatives for vaccination that may be useful in the fields. This study was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP – grant no. 2009/17020-9) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/MAPA – grant no. 578453/2008-8). The authors thank Prof. Antonio C. Alessi and Prof. Rosemeri Vasconcelos (Unesp – Jaboticabal) and Dr. Neil Foster (The University of Nottingham, UK) for the support and partnership in research. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. “
“The authors would like to apologise for errors in Table 2 in the original publication. Table 2 is reproduced in its corrected version below.