Control films were prepared with the same plasticizers but withou

Control films were prepared with the same plasticizers but without nanostructures. Dried films were manually removed and conditioned at approximately 25°C ± 1°C and 52% ± 2% RH in a desiccator for further analysis. All films (including control) were prepared in triplicate. Characterization The mechanical properties of the bio-nanocomposite films (such as tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (EAB), and Young’s modulus (YM)) and the seal strength of the heat-sealed films were determined using a texture analyzer equipped with Texture Exponent 32 V.4.0.5.0 (TA.XT2, Stable Micro System, Godalming, Selleckchem MK 1775 Surrey,

UK) according to ASTM D882-10 (American Society for Testing and Materials, 2010). The initial grip length and crosshead speed were 50 mm and 0.5 mm/s, respectively. EAB and TS at break were calculated from the deformation and force data recorded by the software. The UV-vis spectra of the gelatin/ZnO NR bio-nanocomposite films were recorded using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). A high-resolution X-ray diffraction (XRD) system (X’Pert PRO Materials Research Diffractometer PW3040, PANalytical, selleck chemicals Almelo, The Netherlands) was used to investigate the crystalline structures. A Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Spectrum GX FTIR, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used in this study for

absorption spectroscopy. The conductivity properties of fish gelatin-based nanocomposites were examined using an Agilent 4284a Precision LCR meter (Santa Clara, CA, USA) in the frequency range of 0.01 and 1,000 kHz. The surface topography of the films was measured by atomic force

microscopy (AFM) (Dimension Edge, Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) with a contact operation mode. The surface roughness of the films was calculated based on the root mean square deviation from the average height of the peaks after subtracting the background using Nanoscript Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease software (Veeco Instruments, Plainview, NY, USA) according to ASME B46.1.14. Results and discussion Figure  2a shows the TS and YM. A significant Tideglusib increase in both TS and YM was observed and was consistent with other studies on reinforced biopolymer film by nanoparticles [13]. EAB decreased with the addition of ZnO NRs (Figure  2b), which could be attributed to the moisture content and interfacial interaction between the ZnO NRs and biopolymer matrix. Water plays a plasticizing role in biocomposite films. By contrast, decreasing the plasticizer content increases TS and YM and decreases EAB [14]. The mechanical properties of the biopolymer matrix have been reported to be extremely dependent on the interfacial interaction between the fillers and the matrix [15]. Figure 2 Effects of ZnO NR contents on the mechanical properties of gelatin nanocomposite films. Effects of ZnO NR contents on (a) tensile strength and Young’s modulus and (b) elongation at break and seal strength of gelatin nanocomposite films.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>