1 However, surgical replacement of selleck catalog aortic valves in the 1960s altered the paradigm for management of this disease and led

to nearly normal survival for postoperative patients after aortic valve replacement. By far, the most common etiology of aortic stenosis in patients older than 75 years is degenerative calcification of the valve.2 However, the major caveat of an open surgical approach is that to benefit from surgical aortic valve replacement, the patient must first survive the surgery. The issue of perioperative mortality and Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical morbidity is particularly important in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis, as the frequency of the disease is age-dependent, ranging from about 2.4%, in patients between the ages of 75 and 84, to 7%, in men aged 85 or older.3 Obviously, the risk associated with open-heart surgery is higher in these patients than in those who are younger.

Consequently, a substantial proportion of elderly patients with degenerative aortic stenosis do not undergo surgical Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical valve replacement The advent of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the 1980s led to novel thinking about catheter-based management of aortic valve disease. Originally derived from balloon dilation of the pulmonic valve in pediatric patients, this technique initially offered moderate symptom relief in patients who were not candidates for surgery. However, the results selleckbio proved to be short lived, subsequent survival was dismal (< 25% at three years),4 and enthusiasm for the procedure waned. The advent of percutaneous valve Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical replacement by Cribier5 — inspired by pulmonic valve implantations in late survivors of Tetralogy of Fallot corrections and first performed in

a 57-year-old patient with a congenitally Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical bicuspid aortic valve — led to the gradual development of more user-friendly valves and broader application of their use. In 2010, the PARTNER cohort B study treated 358 otherwise inoperable patients suffering from critical aortic stenosis with transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR). Compared with medical therapy, TAVR saved one life at the end of a year for every five patients treated. By the end of the second year, the number needed to treat had fallen to four. These findings ignited enthusiasm for this procedure and assured it of a place in the mainstream of modern cardiac interventions.6 One valve is currently approved in the United States Cilengitide for use in this population (Edwards SAPIEN), another valve is undergoing clinical trials (Medtronic CoreValve®), and two more are about to enter clinical trials. In Europe, three different valves are approved for clinical use. Investigators and regulatory authorities are currently evaluating expansion of the TAVR population to include patients in lower-risk categories who might otherwise undergo surgical aortic valve replacement albeit at higher-than-average risk.