The review provides a detailed evaluation of the NICE appraisal,

The review provides a detailed evaluation of the NICE appraisal, highlighting differences A-1155463 nmr with the FRAX approach. In a review of the cost-effectiveness analysis performed for NOGG, they point out that the calculations were performed on the basis of an annual cost of £95 for generic alendronate—while the actual cost has now fallen by about 75%. It is pointed out that if resources were allocated to osteoporosis, then this may allow innovative therapy—but in reality, the use of agents, other than alendronate in the UK, is in a minority and continues to fall. The approach adopted by NICE was, of course, fundamentally different from that of NOGG; the guidance is restricted to postmenopausal

women with a T score of −2.5 or below, and other risk Selleckchem Barasertib factors for fracture (excluding men and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis). NICE also distinguishes between primary and secondary prevention, weighting the latter higher. The

approach adopted leads to the differing treatment thresholds described previously, and the difficulty with its adoption in clinical practice. The economic model adopted by NICE has been criticised, and these criticisms are rehearsed in the Kanis review, including a discussion of the selective failure to adopt the clinical risk factors included in FRAX, and the effect of the impact of risk factors on the death hazard. In the review, Kanis and colleagues go on to assess the impact of the use of FRAX and changing the assumptions surrounding the model on the Sapanisertib purchase cost-effectiveness of strontium. They provide cost-effectiveness scenarios for women with a prior fracture and osteopenia, and in opportunistically assessed women with a T score of −2.5 SD or below and a clinical risk factor (except smoking), i.e. at very different thresholds for treatment compared

to NICE. In a recent paper, Bolland et al. [7] compared the approach favoured by NOGG with the US-based National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidance, based on a cohort of older women who participated in a 5-year randomised controlled trial of calcium supplementation and compared the treatment recommendations with fracture outcomes over Tacrolimus (FK506) 5 years for each algorithm. In their cohort, a total of 143 subjects (10%) sustained a non-traumatic osteoporotic fracture, and 21 sustained a non-traumatic hip fracture (1.4%). Applying the NOF guidelines required that 97% of participants undergo bone densitometry and 48% receive treatment. Seventy-six percent of hip fracture cases and 63% of osteoporotic fracture cases were identified for treatment. Applying the NOGG guidelines required that 13% of participants undergo bone densitometry and 21% receive treatment. It is inevitable that cost-effectiveness models will become outdated as further therapies for osteoporosis become generic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>