Methods: A total of 1176 oncology patients participated in the st

Methods: A total of 1176 oncology patients participated in the study. Majority had breast cancer. 58.4% of the patients had

no formal education; 10.7 and 9.5% of patients had college or graduate education respectively. Two out of every three patients lived greater than 200 km from hospital or clinic. One half of patients rented a phone to call.

Results: At 24 months, 97.6% (1132 patients) had sustained their follow-up appointments as against 19.2% (42 patients) who did not receive the phone intervention. 72.8% (14 102 calls) were to discuss illness/treatment. 14% of the calls were rated as emergency by the oncologist. 86.2% of patients found the use of mobile phone convenient/excellent/cheap. 97.6% found the use of the phone worthwhile and preferred the phone to traveling long distance to hospital/ clinic. Also the patients felt that they had not NSC 19893 been forgotten by their doctors and were been taken care of outside

the hospital/clinic.

Conclusions: Low resource countries faced with the burden of cancer care, poor patient follow-up and poor psychosocial support Immunology & Inflammation inhibitor can cash in on this to overcome the persistent problem of poor communication in their healthcare delivery. The potential is enormous to enhance the use of mobile phones in novel ways: developing helpline numbers that can be called for cancer information from prevention to treatment to palliative care. The ability to reach out by mobile phone to a reliable source for medical information about cancer is something that the international community, having experience with helplines, should undertake with colleagues in Africa, who are experimenting with the mobile phone potential. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.”
“Study Design. A proof of concept case study.

Objective. To introduce and evaluate a method for identifying what constitutes a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the SF-36 Physical Function scale at the patient level.

Summary Selleck ON-01910 of Background Data. MCID

has become increasingly important to researchers interested in evaluating patient care. Over the last 30 years, an array of approaches for assessing MCID has evolved with little consensus on which approach applies in any given situation.

Methods. Three approaches for estimating standard errors of measurement (s(e)) and a 30% change approach for establishing MCID were evaluated for the physical function (PF) scale with SPORT patients in the intervertebral disc herniations cohort. MCIDs for each s(e) approach were then developed based on (1) these standard errors and (2) clinically relevant factors including: (a) baseline PF score and (b) acceptable risk for type I error.

Results. Intervertebral disc herniations patients (N = 996) identified from the SPORT database met inclusion criteria. The s(e) for the classic test theory (CTT)-based test level approach was 9.66.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>