6; line 4) Together, these results indicate that full expression

6; line 4). Together, these results indicate that full expression of fixK and nifA requires Hfq. Nonetheless, Hfq-mediated regulation of fixK does not operate under in vitro microoxic conditions and, therefore it could not be relevant to symbiosis. Figure 6 Hfq contributes to the regulation of nifA and fixK expression. RT-PCR analysis on RNA extracted from the wild-type JQ1 price strain this website 1021 (lanes 1 and 3) and the hfq mutant (lanes 2 and 4) before (lanes 1 and 2) and after (lanes 3 and 4) culture incubation for 4 h in microaerobiosis (2% O2). 16S was amplified as constitutive control of expression. Mock-treated

(no RT) RNA samples were also PCR amplified with the same primer combinations to check for absence of DNA contamination (not shown). Some S. meliloti sRNAs bind Hfq Mechanisms underlying Hfq-dependent post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression could involve interaction of the protein with either mRNA or sRNA molecules. We have recently reported on the computational Linsitinib prediction and experimental validation of seven S. meliloti sRNAs, denoted as Smr RNAs, exhibiting differential expression

patterns potentially relevant to symbiosis [30]. To test which of these Smr transcripts are Hfq targets we have used RNA co-inmunoprecipitation (CoIP) with a chromosomally-encoded FLAG epitope-tagged Hfq protein specifically recognized by monoclonal anti-FLAG antibodies in cell extracts of a S. meliloti hfq FLAG strain Dichloromethane dehalogenase (Fig. 7, left panel). This modification did not alter the growth phenotype

of the wild-type strain (not shown), thus suggesting that the tagged variant of the S. meliloti Hfq protein is uncompromised in its ability to bind RNA, as reported in other bacterial species [40]. CoIP RNAs were subjected to Northern analysis with oligonucleotide probes for the Smr RNAs [30]. For each sRNA, Hfq binding was assessed at the growth phase in TY broth where the sRNA was previously shown to be most abundant; log phase for transcripts SmrC7, SmrC9, SmrC14, SmrC16, SmrB35 and SmrC45 and stationary phase for SmrC15. As a control of binding specificity, identical analyses were performed in extracts from the wild-type strain 1021 which does not express any polypeptide recognized by the anti-FLAG antibodies (Fig. 7, left panel). As expected, no hybridization signal was detected for any of the tested sRNAs in CoIP samples from this control strain (Fig. 7, right panel). In contrast, hybridization bands corresponding to SmrC9, SmrC15, SmrC16 and SmrC45 full-length transcripts were readily detected in CoIP RNA from the S. meliloti hfq FLAG strain and thus, they were concluded to specifically bind to the epitope-tagged Hfq protein (Fig. 7, right panel). Comparison of Smr transcripts abundance in the CoIP samples and their expression levels in S. meliloti likely revealed different binding efficiencies of these sRNAs to Hfq.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>