Mastication is the most common method of food processing in mamma

Mastication is the most common method of food processing in mammals, where a combination of three main movements (vertical, lateral and circular) promotes the contact of occlusal surfaces of lower and upper teeth.23, 38 and 39 In dolphins, selleck compound food processing results from limited mastication23 combined with a component of suction feeding.40 However, mastication and occlusal contact are probably far less prominent in cetaceans than in many terrestrial mammals. During food processing, dolphins use mainly the vertical movements of jaws, but lateral and circular movements may also be executed less prominently.23 The repeated tooth-to-tooth contact between the margins of teeth when the lower

jaw is closed is considered the main cause of lateral wear facets, mainly in the mesio-distal surfaces.22 and 41 Direct opposition of teeth during less prominent lateral and circular movements could be responsible for apical wear. In this case, food apprehension could also have a role in wearing down the apex of teeth by abrasion.23 and 26 Simultaneous wear in the tooth

apex and lateral margins were frequent in dolphins in our study, reinforcing the role of limited jaw movements and dental interdigitation as main generators of dental wear. Wear facets restricted to the apex or lateral faces isolated were less frequent in our sample. As reported in previous studies, simultaneous apical/lateral wear facets were also common in museum specimens of several other mammal groups.41 Wear under the gum line is not uncommon in delphinids,20, 21 and 23 indicating Methocarbamol that tooth tissues below the crown may be affected. The tooth cingulum MAPK Inhibitor Library high throughput and root, which are covered by the periodontium and are encased in

the alveoli, proportionally were less worn than the dental crown. Coronal wear facets were the most frequent in our study, with exception of the Globicephalinae species O. orca and P. crassidens, where wear facets down to the cingulum and root level were relatively common. Even if we consider the small sample sizes of these species, it is important to mention that tooth morphology and feeding behaviour should be influencing not only the high wear rates, but also the extension of worn areas. The relatively larger cingulum and roots of O. orca and P. crassidens would be more susceptible to dental wear than those species with smaller teeth, as the mesio-distal surfaces worn by tooth-to-tooth attrition could more easily be extended towards the cingulum and root. 2 Ford et al. 26 related the extreme dental wear observed in offshore killer whales to a diet based on sharks, in contrast with the minor or negligible wear of resident and transient killer whales, whose diet is based on fish and marine mammals, respectively. Unfortunately we cannot compare the diet and wear patterns of our sample of killer whales, due to lack of information on feeding habits of the sampled individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>